🇰🇷 한글 설명
Linux 커널의 BPF 검증기(Verifier)가 동기식 콜백 함수의 참조 상태 관리를 잘못 처리하여 발생하는 취약점입니다. 콜백 함수가 여러 번 실행될 수 있는 경우에도 검증기가 이를 단 한 번의 실행으로 간주하여 참조 횟수(Reference Count)를 잘못 계산함으로써 메모리 누수나 보안 결함을 초래할 수 있습니다.
💡 쉬운 설명
컴퓨터 프로그램이 메모리를 빌려 쓰고 돌려주는 과정을 관리할 때, 빌린 횟수와 돌려준 횟수를 제대로 세지 못하는 오류가 발견되었습니다. 이로 인해 메모리가 제대로 정리되지 않거나 보안상 허점이 생길 수 있습니다.
🇺🇸 원문 (English)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
bpf: Fix reference state management for synchronous callbacks
Currently, verifier verifies callback functions (sync and async) as if
they will be executed once, (i.e. it explores execution state as if the
function was being called once). The next insn to explore is set to
start of subprog and the exit from nested frame is handled using
curframe > 0 and prepare_func_exit. In case of async callback it uses a
customized variant of push_stack simulating a kind of branch to set up
custom state and execution context for the async callback.
While this approach is simple and works when callback really will be
executed only once, it is unsafe for all of our current helpers which
are for_each style, i.e. they execute the callback multiple times.
A callback releasing acquired references of the caller may do so
multiple times, but currently verifier sees it as one call inside the
frame, which then returns to caller. Hence, it thinks it released some
reference that the cb e.g. got access through callback_ctx (register
filled inside cb from spilled typed register on stack).
Similarly, it may see that an acquire call is unpaired inside the
callback, so the caller will copy the reference state of callback and
then will have to release the register with new ref_obj_ids. But again,
the callback may execute multiple times, but the verifier will only
account for acquired references for a single symbolic execution of the
callback, which will cause leaks.
Note that for async callback case, things are different. While currently
we have bpf_timer_set_callback which only executes it once, even for
multiple executions it would be safe, as reference state is NULL and
check_reference_leak would force program to release state before
BPF_EXIT. The state is also unaffected by analysis for the caller frame.
Hence async callback is safe.
Since we want the reference state to be accessible, e.g. for pointers
loaded from stack through callback_ctx's PTR_TO_STACK, we still have to
copy caller's reference_state to callback's bpf_func_state, but we
enforce that whatever references it adds to that reference_state has
been released before it hits BPF_EXIT. This requires introducing a new
callback_ref member in the reference state to distinguish between caller
vs callee references. Hence, check_reference_leak now errors out if it
sees we are in callback_fn and we have not released callback_ref refs.
Since there can be multiple nested callbacks, like frame 0 -> cb1 -> cb2
etc. we need to also distinguish between whether this particular ref
belongs to this callback frame or parent, and only error for our own, so
we store state->frameno (which is always non-zero for callbacks).
In short, callbacks can read parent reference_state, but cannot mutate
it, to be able to use pointers acquired by the caller. They must only
undo their changes (by releasing their own acquired_refs before
BPF_EXIT) on top of caller reference_state before returning (at which
point the caller and callback state will match anyway, so no need to
copy it back to caller).
📍 영향받는 시스템
Linux Kernel (BPF 관련 기능이 활성화된 버전)
⚔️ 공격 벡터
특수하게 조작된 BPF 프로그램을 로드하여 커널의 참조 카운트 불일치를 유도함
🛡️ 대응 방법
Linux 커널을 최신 보안 패치가 적용된 버전으로 업데이트함
🔧 검증 코드
출력된 커널 버전이 해당 취약점이 수정된 패치 버전 이후인지 확인합니다.