🔍 CVE-2026-23086

5.5
CVSS Score
MEDIUM
2026-02-04
2026-10-19 19:17
✅ 완료

🇰🇷 한글 설명

Linux 커널의 virtio-vsock 구현에서 원격 엔드포인트가 설정한 버퍼 크기에 따라 호스트의 TX 크레딧이 결정되는 취약점입니다. 악의적인 게스트가 큰 버퍼 크기를 광고하고 데이터를 천천히 읽음으로써 호스트의 커널 메모리(Slab/SUnreclaim)를 과도하게 점유하여 시스템을 마비시킬 수 있습니다.

💡 쉬운 설명

가상 머신이 호스트 컴퓨터에게 '나는 데이터를 아주 많이 받을 수 있어'라고 거짓말을 하여, 호스트의 메모리를 전부 써버리게 만드는 공격입니다. 이로 인해 호스트 컴퓨터가 느려지거나 멈출 수 있습니다.

🇺🇸 원문 (English)

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: vsock/virtio: cap TX credit to local buffer size The virtio transports derives its TX credit directly from peer_buf_alloc, which is set from the remote endpoint's SO_VM_SOCKETS_BUFFER_SIZE value. On the host side this means that the amount of data we are willing to queue for a connection is scaled by a guest-chosen buffer size, rather than the host's own vsock configuration. A malicious guest can advertise a large buffer and read slowly, causing the host to allocate a correspondingly large amount of sk_buff memory. The same thing would happen in the guest with a malicious host, since virtio transports share the same code base. Introduce a small helper, virtio_transport_tx_buf_size(), that returns min(peer_buf_alloc, buf_alloc), and use it wherever we consume peer_buf_alloc. This ensures the effective TX window is bounded by both the peer's advertised buffer and our own buf_alloc (already clamped to buffer_max_size via SO_VM_SOCKETS_BUFFER_MAX_SIZE), so a remote peer cannot force the other to queue more data than allowed by its own vsock settings. On an unpatched Ubuntu 22.04 host (~64 GiB RAM), running a PoC with 32 guest vsock connections advertising 2 GiB each and reading slowly drove Slab/SUnreclaim from ~0.5 GiB to ~57 GiB; the system only recovered after killing the QEMU process. That said, if QEMU memory is limited with cgroups, the maximum memory used will be limited. With this patch applied: Before: MemFree: ~61.6 GiB Slab: ~142 MiB SUnreclaim: ~117 MiB After 32 high-credit connections: MemFree: ~61.5 GiB Slab: ~178 MiB SUnreclaim: ~152 MiB Only ~35 MiB increase in Slab/SUnreclaim, no host OOM, and the guest remains responsive. Compatibility with non-virtio transports: - VMCI uses the AF_VSOCK buffer knobs to size its queue pairs per socket based on the local vsk->buffer_* values; the remote side cannot enlarge those queues beyond what the local endpoint configured. - Hyper-V's vsock transport uses fixed-size VMBus ring buffers and an MTU bound; there is no peer-controlled credit field comparable to peer_buf_alloc, and the remote endpoint cannot drive in-flight kernel memory above those ring sizes. - The loopback path reuses virtio_transport_common.c, so it naturally follows the same semantics as the virtio transport. This change is limited to virtio_transport_common.c and thus affects virtio-vsock, vhost-vsock, and loopback, bringing them in line with the "remote window intersected with local policy" behaviour that VMCI and Hyper-V already effectively have. [Stefano: small adjustments after changing the previous patch] [Stefano: tweak the commit message]

📍 영향받는 시스템

Linux kernel (virtio-vsock, vhost-vsock, loopback 사용 환경)

⚔️ 공격 벡터

악의적인 게스트가 대규모 버퍼 크기를 광고하고 데이터를 의도적으로 천천히 읽어 호스트의 sk_buff 메모리 할당을 유도함

🛡️ 대응 방법

Linux 커널을 최신 보안 패치가 적용된 버전으로 업데이트하여 virtio_transport_tx_buf_size() 제한 로직을 적용함

🔧 검증 코드

출력된 커널 버전이 해당 취약점이 해결된 패치 버전 이후인지 확인합니다.

Shell / Script
uname -r

📊 CVSS Vector String

CVSS Vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

💻 영향받는 소프트웨어

Linux Kernel