🔍 CVE-2026-64459

9.8
CVSS Score
CRITICAL
2026-07-25
2026-08-17 05:17
✅ 완료

🇰🇷 한글 설명

Linux 커널의 TCP-AO/TCP-MD5 처리 과정에서 RCU grace period가 누락되어 발생하는 Use-After-Free 취약점입니다. 특정 조건에서 소켓 파괴 시 메모리가 즉시 해제되어, 다른 CPU의 softirq 컨텍스트에서 해제된 메모리에 접근할 때 시스템 충돌이나 임의 코드 실행이 발생할 수 있습니다.

💡 쉬운 설명

컴퓨터가 데이터를 처리하는 도중에 사용 중인 메모리를 너무 빨리 지워버려서 발생하는 문제입니다. 공격자가 이 허점을 이용하면 시스템을 강제로 멈추게 하거나 제어권을 뺏을 수 있습니다.

🇺🇸 원문 (English)

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tcp: restore RCU grace period in tcp_ao_destroy_sock Commit 51e547e8c89c ("tcp: Free TCP-AO/TCP-MD5 info/keys without RCU") removed the call_rcu() callback from tcp_ao_destroy_sock(), arguing that "the destruction of info/keys is delayed until the socket destructor" and therefore "no one can discover it anymore". That argument does not hold for the call site in tcp_connect() (net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:4327-4332). At that point the socket is in TCP_SYN_SENT, has already been inserted into the inet ehash by inet_hash_connect() in tcp_v4_connect(), and is therefore very much discoverable: any softirq running tcp_v4_rcv() on another CPU can take the socket out of the ehash, walk into tcp_inbound_hash(), and load tp->ao_info via implicit RCU before bh_lock_sock_nested() is taken on the destroying CPU. The reader path then enters __tcp_ao_do_lookup() (net/ipv4/tcp_ao.c:208) which re-loads tp->ao_info via rcu_dereference_check(); the re-load can still observe the (about-to-be-freed) pointer because there is no synchronize_rcu() between rcu_assign_pointer(tp->ao_info, NULL) and tcp_ao_info_free() in tcp_ao_destroy_sock(). The captured pointer is then walked at line 223: hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(key, &ao->head, node, ...) The writer's synchronous kfree() is free to complete between the line 218 re-fetch and the line 223 hlist iteration. The slab is reused (or simply LIST_POISON1-stamped if not yet reused) and the iteration walks attacker-controlled or poison memory in softirq context. Reproducer (no debug shim, stock x86_64 v7.1-rc2 SMP+KASAN, QEMU+KVM): an unprivileged uid=1000 process inside CLONE_NEWUSER|CLONE_NEWNET installs TCP_MD5SIG + TCP_AO_ADD_KEY on a TCP socket, sprays forged TCP-AO segments toward its eventual 4-tuple via raw sockets, then calls connect(). The md5-wins reconciliation in tcp_connect() fires tcp_ao_destroy_sock(); the softirq backlog reader on the loopback NAPI path crashes on the freed ao->head.first walk: Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xfbd59c000000002f KASAN: maybe wild-memory-access in range [0xdead000000000178-0xdead00000000017f] CPU: 0 UID: 1000 PID: 100 Comm: repro_userns RIP: 0010:__tcp_ao_do_lookup+0x107/0x1c0 Call Trace: <IRQ> __tcp_ao_do_lookup+0x107/0x1c0 tcp_ao_inbound_lookup.constprop.0+0x12a/0x200 tcp_inbound_ao_hash+0x5ea/0x1520 tcp_inbound_hash+0x7ce/0x1240 tcp_v4_rcv+0x1e7a/0x3e10 ... Restore the RCU grace period: re-add struct rcu_head to tcp_ao_info and replace the synchronous tcp_ao_info_free() with a call_rcu() callback. Readers that captured tp->ao_info before rcu_assign_pointer NULLed it now see the object remain valid until rcu_read_unlock(). With the patch applied the reproducer runs cleanly for 2000 iterations on the same kernel build.

📍 영향받는 시스템

Linux kernel (TCP-AO/TCP-MD5 기능이 활성화된 버전)

⚔️ 공격 벡터

비특권 사용자가 네트워크 네임스페이스 내에서 조작된 TCP-AO 세그먼트를 전송하여 커널 메모리 오류 유도

🛡️ 대응 방법

커널 패치를 적용하여 tcp_ao_destroy_sock() 함수에 RCU grace period(call_rcu)를 복구해야 함

🔧 검증 코드

출력된 커널 버전이 해당 취약점이 수정된 패치 버전 이후인지 확인하십시오.

Shell / Script
uname -r

📊 CVSS Vector String

CVSS Vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

💻 영향받는 소프트웨어

Linux Kernel