🔍 CVE-2026-89762

7.8
CVSS Score
HIGH
2026-09-11
2026-10-30 13:20
✅ 완료

🇰🇷 한글 설명

Linux 커널의 AppArmor 모듈에서 begin_current_label_crit_section() 함수 호출 시 발생하는 Use-After-Free(UAF) 취약점입니다. 보안 레이블 업데이트 과정에서 자격 증명(credentials)의 참조 횟수가 잘못 관리되어, 이미 해제된 메모리 영역에 접근할 수 있는 문제가 발생합니다.

💡 쉬운 설명

컴퓨터의 보안 권한을 관리하는 과정에서, 이미 사용이 끝난 권한 정보를 시스템이 계속 사용하려고 시도하여 발생하는 오류입니다. 이로 인해 시스템이 갑자기 멈추거나 해커가 권한을 탈취할 위험이 있습니다.

🇺🇸 원문 (English)

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: apparmor: fix cred UAF caused by begin_current_label_crit_section() AppArmor's begin_current_label_crit_section() is a scary function called from lots of LSM hooks (in particular VFS/socket-related ones) that checks if the label referenced by the current creds is marked FLAG_STALE, and if so, attempts to use aa_replace_current_label() to replace the creds with an updated version that uses a new label. The first problem with this is that it would directly lead to UAF of `struct cred` if anything in the kernel takes a pointer to the current creds and accesses these past a security hook invocation that replaces creds, like so: ``` const struct cred *cred = current_cred(); alloc_file_pseudo(...); uid_t uid = cred->euid; ``` I don't know if anything in the kernel actually does this, but I think it is very surprising that this pattern could lead to UAF. The second problem is that things go wrong when aa_replace_current_label() runs with overridden credentials. aa_replace_current_label() bails out if `current_cred() != current_real_cred()` (mirroring the check in proc_pid_attr_write()), but this check can't actually reliably detect overridden credentials because the overridden creds can be the same as the objective creds. So in approximately the following scenario, things go wrong: 1. task begins with <creds A> (as both objective and subjective creds), with refcount=2 2. task grabs an extra reference on <creds A> for overriding 3. task calls override_creds(<creds A>), which returns a pointer to the old subjective creds (<creds A>) 4. task enters AppArmor LSM hook 5. AppArmor checks that objective/subjective creds are equal 6. AppArmor replaces both cred pointers with <creds B> and drops 2 refs on <creds A> 7. task leaves AppArmor LSM hook 8. task calls revert_creds(<creds A>) 9. now task->cred is <creds A> while task->real_cred is <creds B>, but the task_struct logically holds two references to <creds B> 10. another task drops the extra reference on <creds A> that was used for overriding, refcount drops to 0 11. now task->real_cred points to freed creds At this point, any access to current_cred() will be UAF. I have a test case where I run aa-disable on a profile while a process using that profile is blocked on splice() from a FUSE passthrough file into a full pipe; after the profile update, the pipe becomes empty, splice() resumes, the credentials go out of sync, and a subsequent getuid() syscall results in a KASAN UAF splat. To fix this, instead of directly replacing creds, do it via task_work that will run at the end of the current syscall. (The point in time at which the cred replacement happens should have no correctness impact; it is just a performance optimization to avoid unnecessarily touching the refcount of the new label.) Note that AppArmor still performs direct cred replacements in the sb_pivotroot LSM hook after this change, and that direct cred replacements can still happen in VFS ->write() callbacks via proc_pid_attr_write(). There are two options for what to do with aa_dup_task_ctx(): Either explicitly reset new->label_replacement_pending after the entire aa_task_ctx has been copied, or switch to manually copying members over. I am switching to manually copying members over because that should make bugs more obvious.

📍 영향받는 시스템

AppArmor가 활성화된 Linux 커널 (취약한 버전)

⚔️ 공격 벡터

특정 LSM 훅(VFS/socket 관련) 호출 중 AppArmor 프로필 업데이트를 유도하여 메모리 참조 오류 유발

🛡️ 대응 방법

커널 패치를 통해 자격 증명 교체 방식을 직접 교체가 아닌 task_work를 통한 지연 처리 방식으로 변경

🔧 검증 코드

출력된 커널 버전을 확인하여 최신 보안 패치가 적용된 버전인지 배포판 보안 공지를 통해 대조하십시오.

Shell / Script
uname -r

📊 CVSS Vector String

CVSS Vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

💻 영향받는 소프트웨어

Linux Kernel